...
Time | Item | Presenter | Notes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
21:00-21:30 | Last Sprint: Retrospective Full report here: | We had a brief presentation of the last Sprint just closed in the same date, pointing that we had a focus factor of zero (based on closed isses) because of some problems we had during the Sprint itself:
All the participants agreed that we are eager to finalize the following issues:
And to proceed with a new Sprint definition that cannot require more than 1d 6h effort (according with the last sprint average velocity). | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
21:30-22:30 | the approved
| A long discussion about the pattern to be used in developing the new REST API component (openhospital-api), conflicting points:
The discussion ended-up without a common decision, so the way forward is to continue the OP-6 everybody with a full implementation of his own pattern and we’ll decide together which one is better on a more effective evidences. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22:30 | 23:30 | In the remaining time we talked about the “ui” state of the art. In particular we summarized the activities held during the Torino Hacknight (mostly focused on the “ui”) and the way forward. We took chance also to think about the structure of the code, since we faced a cross-component version problem, so Roberto C proposed the use of Maven modules, but there are also other suggestion coming from the community (git subtree) We explained how to keep communication active by commenting the issues themselves and by using (if preferred) the Slack channel opened for the front-end developers, but that can be easily used for any other aspect of the project: |
...