Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Option 1

Option 2

Option 3

Description

Replicate Open Hospital structure
(Spring + React + Material UI)

Use a different JS library
(e.g. Devias Kit, Creative Tim, Tabler, etc…)

Use existing softwares
(e.g. Grafana, Jasper, etc…)

Pros and cons

(plus) Same as Open Hospital, in the future the two projects could be easily merged

(plus) Homogeneity, same community can contribute to the project

(minus) The current material UI could be poor in terms of widgets and layout managers

(plus) Leverage special features

(minus) It may need specific knowledge

(plus) Some features granted by the software itself

(plus) Levering high quality features

(plus) In case of Jasper, it could be useful for porting the current reporting system in the “gui”

(minus) It could include several unwanted features making the application heavier than needed

(minus) Strong binding to an existing software can be risky

Estimated cost

Status
colourGreen
titleSMALL
/
Status
colourYellow
titleMEDIUM
/
Status
colourRed
titleLarge

Status
colourGreen
titleSMALL
/
Status
colourYellow
titleMEDIUM
/
Status
colourRed
titleLarge

Status
colourGreen
titleSMALL
/
Status
colourYellow
titleMEDIUM
/
Status
colourRed
titleLarge

✅ Action items

  •  To decide the final Option
  •  To create Jira issues with analysis' outcome Alessandro Domanico and to group them under an Epic issue

...